| Home | Contact us | Links | Archives | |||
|
Ten Reasons To Retain The Current Electoral Commission
|
|||
|
ISSUE 267
|
Performing a major task demands knowledge and experience. That is why in every advertised vacancy, experience is the main selection factor. If recruiting a salesman in a small company needs a selection criteria based on proven track record, what kind of selection criteria do we need for a member of our electoral commission who will referee the toughest contest in the land? If we are seriously looking for a just and fair contest in the forthcoming Local Government and other elections, we must ensure that the election commission has the knowledge and experience to deliver the dream but highly difficult task of free and fair elections. I believe the current Commission can deliver better service than a fresh one because of the following reasons:
There are many more points to support the need for sustainability of the commission and I will not finish all day if I try to cover them all. However, it is important to note that I agree with the idea of adjusting (increasing) the size of the Commission to up to 13 members in order to have 2 members in each region at election times. I believe a completely new Electoral commission means starting from Scratch again and can lead the nation to disastrous election mistakes. I believe all those aiming to run for public office will agree with me that sustaining the current Electoral Commission has 100% better chance of holding a much fairer election than a new Commission simply because experience is wealth and weapon. The President’s persistence to remove this commission and ignore the elected house of parliament puts serious doubts on his intentions towards the whole idea of free and fair elections. How can we call our country a democratic nation when the President is not paying any respect to the legislations of the elected House? This is a leadership dilemma for the nation. Justice is the only way forward
|
||
|
Home | Contact us | Links | Archives |
|||