Issue 377
|
Front
Page |
|
News Headlines
|
|
|
|
Local
and Regional Affairs |
|
|
|
Editorial |
|
|
|
Features
& Commentry |
|
|
|
International News
|
|
|
|
Opinion |
|
|
|
|
By Jerry Okungu
Hargeysa, Somaliland
Eng. Faisal Ali Warabe, President of the UCID opposition party, the
third largest political party in Somaliland believes that Somaliland is
on an irreversible path to democracy with a sound and credible
multiparty political culture.
He swears that the citizen is the backbone of political power; therefore
his or her participation is fundamental. The citizen therefore deserves
the right to be protected from state excessive power.
He, like many Somaliland politicians, is appalled at the apparent
indifference of the world community to the plight of his country despite
19 years of relative peace and democratic governance.
His theory as to why African states have never recognized Somaliland is
an interesting one and suggestive of a theory of international
conspiracy to safe-guard special interests that may not be so obvious to
the rest of Somalilanders and other African states.
As much as his country needs the support of African states; the same
states have over the years been unable to formulate credible foreign
policies of their own. Their dependence on foreign aid from more
powerful nations in the West has deprived them of ability to make
independent decisions on questions like the Somaliland sovereignty.
The Somaliland question is directly linked to the struggle for supremacy
between Somalia and Ethiopia in the Horn of Africa. And Somali being an
Islamic State makes it a case of interest for the rest of the Arab world
and more particularly the Arab League kingpin- Egypt.
The fact that Ethiopia has closer ties with Somaliland to the extent
that it is the only country with an Embassy in Hargeysa; has unsettled
the nerves of the Cairo government bearing in mind that Ethiopian desire
to control the source of the Nile waters; the lifeline of Egyptian
survival has been a cause for concern to the Egyptians since colonial
times. After fighting a bitter war with Eritrea, the Addis regime had to
switch from the port of Asmara to Berbera seaport in Somaliland for it
external trade.
Egypt believes that a stronger and united Somalia state would be a
deterrent to Ethiopia should the latter take drastic actions to go to
war with Egypt over Nile waters. If such a situation arose, Egypt would
count a fellow Muslim country to offer logistical as well as military
support. That country has to be a strong and united Somalia.
The reason other Islamic states in the Arab world including Sudan cannot
recognize Somaliland is because for the wealthier Arab states; their
foreign policies are guided by the more powerful Egyptian state which
also is America’s strongest ally after Israel in the entire Middle East.
The Somaliland question gets more complicated when one ropes in the
Italian connection, a former colonial master of the now failed state of
Somalia. It is in Italian interest to sustain the Somali nation in order
to retain its influence in the region. Its voice in the AU therefore
carries weight when it comes to the Somaliland debate.
This could be the reason the European Union is pouring millions of
dollars into the country, rehabilitating and rebuilding universities and
other institutions as well as sponsoring their electoral processes but
at the same time withholding tacit recognition of the Hargeysa regime!
The Egyptian role in denying Somaliland UN recognition became more
evident when Boutros Boutros Ghali, an Egyptian was the Secretary
General of the United Nations. When Somaliland presented its credentials
for the UN General Assembly consideration, the documents were never even
tabled at the Assembly because it would not be in the interest of the
Egyptian people!
Somalilanders see their failure to get international recognition as
double standards the international community is famous for.
This hypocrisy forgets that Somaliland was a sovereign state in 1960
with a seat at the UN General Assembly before it voluntarily formed a
Union government with Italian Somalia.
Now, the proponents of One Somalia forget that in the same region and
other parts of the world, the same UN, AU and EU have sanctioned the
separation of several states including Eritrea from Ethiopia, Polisario
from Morocco, the independence of East Timor, the fragmentation of
former Yugoslavia into ethnic enclaves and allowed several East European
states to split from former Soviet Union.
UCID as a political party draws its inspiration and democratic practice
from well established European political parties. They look up to the
Social Democratic Party of Germany and the Labor Party of UK among other
like-minded parties.
As a party, they are committed to the development of the Somaliland
nation and will strive to ensure that Somaliland gets accepted and
recognized by the international community. It is a party with a strong
Diaspora influence , having been founded in Europe by exiles while Siyad
Barre made it difficult for them to operate in the then Somalia.
The UCID party leaders are strong believers in Pan Africanism and will
work if elected to power to promote regional integration and African
unity throughout the continent.
Five fundamental principles guide the UCID operations:
1. To maintain and safeguard Somaliland’s independence and sovereignty
2. Turn Somaliland into a welfare state where every citizen enjoys basic
rights and access to services such as security, shelter, education,
healthcare and food security
3. Their vision of Somaliland is that of a decentralized state where
each region is autonomous in order to bring government and services
closer to the people of Somaliland
4. To produce young and visionary leadership that will be able to
eradicate tribalism and clanism
5. To build strong and viable institutions that can safeguard the rights
of the people irrespective of regime change
When asked why elections in Somaliland have been postponed twice since
May 2008, the party president cited several plausible reasons even
though they may not be the opinion of the majority of their members.
One of the reasons they share with UDUB the ruling party is that there
is need for a new voter registration to comply with the new EU sponsored
electronic voting system.
To understand the new technology, the sponsors wanted the Electoral
Commission to understand the technology and the process if elections
were to be credible.
For this reason voter registration commenced in August 2008 after the
new system had been installed and field personnel trained on their
application. The process was supposed to end in January 2009 after six
months of national registration. However, on October 29, 2008, there was
a major terrorist attack in Hargeysa that targeted the Presidential
Palace, the UNDP Country office and the Ethiopian Embassy.
Following this attack that left at least 30 people dead, all foreign
workers in Somaliland were evacuated as several of their operations
closed down. This incident drastically disrupted the voter registration
that only resumed after January 2009.
However, terrorist attack aside, the UCID believes that Somaliland has
an inefficient and incompetent electoral Commission. The party also
feels the government was not keen on holding elections on time in the
first place.
They are arguing that there are forces within Somaliland that worked
against voter registration. For example, they cannot understand reasons
for the latest postponement considering that experts from the European
Union who will manage the process have been in the country for a long
time now. Due to this delay, many donors have either stopped or
suspended their support for political parties.
Despite this anger with the government over the latest election
postponement, UCID as a party feels that public demonstrations are not
the way to solve the problem because Somaliland, like the rest of
Somalia is a fluid and unstable society. More importantly, the police
are not trained to handle civilians with care. The police don’t even
have teargas canisters or water cannons to deal with demonstrations. If
such a situation were to arise, they would most likely use live
ammunition and there would be unnecessary loss of life.
Whereas the party will not take part in street demonstrations, members
feel that it is within the rights of every citizen to demonstrate
peacefully and the government has a duty to protect every citizen
including those that may demonstrate against it from time to time.
Jerryokungu@gmail.com
Posted By Africa News Online April 9, 2009
|