Issue 386
|
Front
Page |
|
News Headlines
|
|
|
|
Local
and Regional Affairs |
|
|
|
Editorial |
|
|
|
Features
& Commentary |
|
|
|
International News
|
|
|
|
Opinion |
|
|
|
|
There are
scholars one can disagree with and learn nothing from them, for example
the two Samatar brothers (Abdi Ismail Samatar and Ahmad Ismail Samatar).
There are also scholars one can disagree with and still learn something
from them. Professor Said Samatar of Rutegers University belongs to the
latter category. His insights into Somali affairs, even when he is not
on target, often provide food for thought. That is why despite our
policy of not answering opinion pieces, we are making exception and
replying to his article “Somalia: a nation’s literary death tops its
political demise” which appeared in wardheernews.com.
As can be gleaned from its title, his article deals with two main
issues: Somalia’s political death and Somalia’s literary death. His
central thesis is that because of the war and anarchy that has been
taking place in Somalia since the collapse of the central government,
not only has Somalia as a political entity died but Somali literature
too has died.
The political death of Somalia as a unified and centrally governed
country has been a self-evident for almost two decades. So, no argument
here. As to the death of Somalia’s literature, we do have a bone to pick
with the professor. But first let us look at the evidence he provides to
support his claim. Mr. Samatar compares the literary outpouring that
accompanied the wars between the British and Muhammad Abdille Hasan with
the lack of a similar literary output during the wars of the last two
decades, and from this he concludes that Somali literature has died with
the death of the Somalia as a state.
There are several problems with this analysis. But the most important
one which goes to the heart of his thesis is that the literature that he
claims belonged to Somalia actually did not belong to Somalia, but
rather belonged to Somaliland. The poets that Said Samatar cites who
were involved in those disputes of the early twentieth century, poets
like Ali Jama Habil, Salan Arabey, Ali Dhuh, Muhammad Abdille Hassan
(although his clan resides mainly outside Somaliland they have cultural
affinity with Somalilanders and are among Somalis who say yidhi instead
of yiri), were almost all Somalilanders. The places where this drama
took place were mostly in Somaliland, particularly the northeast.
So when Said Samatar berates the people of Somalia for not having lived
up to the literary example of the past century, he is playing fast and
loose with the facts. By equating the terms “Somali” and “Somalia” and
using them interchangeably as if they denote the same thing, Said
Samatar hands Somaliland’s literature to Somalia, then he is miffed with
Somalia for not producing the kind of literature that he bestowed upon
it. Said Samatar’s sleight of hand ends up doing a disservice to both
Somaliland and Somalia. He dispossesses Somaliland of its literary
heritage and imposes on Somalia a heritage that does not sit well with
many of its denizens, particularly in the south, where that literature
and its accompanying history are seen as instruments of northern
hegemony. Ali Jimale, a southern intellectual, for instance, rejects
this literature and what he calls the “dervishization” of Somali history
which he defines this way: “"By dervishization is meant a conscious
effort on the part of successive Somali regimes and their intellectual
acolytes to monumentalize, to the exclusion of other groups, the dervish
experience in Somali history."
There are other problems with Said Samatar’s article:
(1) His uncritical endorsement and championing of the bloody, warrior
type of poetry based on clan feuds and vendettas and his insufficient
attention to more introspective and Sufi-influenced poetry or the love
poetry started by Elmi Bodhari that are better suited for expressing
modern aesthetics.
(2) He skips over the whole period that spans the years 1920-1991 as if
it had nothing to offer. This is tied to his Fanonian glorification of
violence which he dubs as “purposive violence”. But even here, Said
Samatar shows his bias against Somaliland when he claims that the Somali
civil war started in 1991 when in fact it started a decade earlier. He
also does not mention any of the literature that was produced during the
SNM struggle in the 1980s, other than a passing reference to Hadrawi,
Gaariye and Qasim. The fact that he has ignored the literature of this
period, even though it fits his notion of purposive violence, shows that
he is guided by an extra-literary agenda.
Overall, if Said Samatar’s approach to Somali history and literature
could be summed up, it is one based on downplaying of Somaliland’s place
in the Somali literary map, exaggerating the role of some marginal
figures such as Muhammad Daahir Afrah, Lidwien Kapteijns, Muhammad A.
Riiraash, and the handing over of Somaliland’s literature to Somalia.
One of these, Lidwien Kapteijns, even wrote a whole book on Somaliland’s
literature (Women’s voices in a man’s world) without bothering to
mention that as she was collecting material for her book in neighboring
Djibouti, the people whose literature she was studying were at the time
homeless refugees across the border in Ethiopia, having been driven from
their homes through aerial bombardment.
Fortunately, the people of Somaliland have won their struggle for
freedom and are now living in their homes, back from their exile in
Ethiopia and other lands. Among the returnees are Somaliland’s poets and
artists who are currently the only Somali artists and poets (other than
those in Djibouti) who have the peace and stability (and yes the freedom
that their counterparts in Djibouti do not have) in which art and
culture could flourish. In a sense there is nothing new here, for
Somaliland has always been the cultural and artistic center of the
Somali world. To confirm this all one has to do is check the long list
of poets and artists that Somaliland has produced.
Said Samatar has every right to mourn the death of Somalia, but to
equate the political death of Somalia with the death of Somali
literature is a lie that can easily be disproved by the fact that the
luminaries of Somali literature, people like Abdi Qays, Hassan Gini,
Banfas, Hadrawi, Garriye and many others are alive and kicking in
Somaliland.
|