|
By: Dr. Michael A. Weinstein
The chapter of Somalia’s political history that has been dominated by
the attempt of the United States, working through the United Nations, to
manage the “transition” of Somalia’s Transitional Federal Government (T.F.G.)
to a permanent set of governing institutions has ended with the collapse
of the U.S.-U.N. initiative.
The effort to guide the “transition” had been doomed to failure from its
outset in early 2011, but it appears that the U.S. had to learn the
lesson that Somali factions and external actors are too divided and
fragmented to be directed by any player/stakeholder/power the hard way.
A new chapter now opens up in which the actual situation, in which there
is no dominant actor, no protagonist, no point of momentum in Somalia’s
political conflicts,is obvious and at least tacitly acknowledged by all
domestic and external parties.
The U.S.-U.N. plan to substitute a new set of institutions for the
Transitional Federal Institutions (T.F.I.s) when the latter’s mandate
expires in August, 2011 ran to ground on April 13 with the failure of
the last U.S.-U.N. attempt to take over the “transition” – a
“consultative” conference of Somali factions in Nairobi sponsored by the
U.N. The story of the run-up to the conference, its unfolding, and its
aftermath brings out the current balance of power among the actors in
Somalia’s conflicts and those actors’ checks and counter-checks on each
other that prevent the emergence of a coherent configuration of power in
the territories of post-independence Somalia, much less the semblance of
a political system and even less political integration, which remains a
distant and receding dream.
Run-Up to the Conference
The U.S.-U.N.’s campaign to manage the “transition” entered its final
phase on April 5 and 6 when the U.N.’s special representative for
Somalia, Augustine Mahiga, publically committed to holding the Nairobi
conference despite the fact that the T.F.G. and the self-declared
republic of Somaliland had rejected invitations to attend it. Somaliland
had been expected to spurn the conference; it would not compromise its
project of gaining international recognition for its independence. The
T.F.G. was determined to resist efforts to end its term in August and
placed itself firmly in opposition to the U.S.-U.N.’s plans. The absence
of Somaliland and the T.F.G. from the conference would deprive the
meeting of its raison d’etre – to bring together the major Somali
political groups (except the armed Islamist opposition) to discuss the
conditions for ending the T.F.G. in August and what arrangement would
replace it.
With the conference seemingly compromised in advance, it is not
surprising that Mahiga seemed to be on the defensive in his press
conference announcing it on April 6. The T.F.G.’s rejection of his
invitation brooded over his remarks, although he did not address it
directly. Instead, Mahiga said that the conference’s agenda included
creating a “good working relationship” between the T.F.G. and the
Transitional Federal Parliament (T.F.P.), which were locked in a power
struggle over different conceptions of the term extension of the T.F.I.s,
neither one accepting its own termination in August, as the U.S.-U.N.
desired. The fact that the U.S.-U.N had been forced to divert its
attention from effecting the “transition” to trying to resolve a
conflict between the T.FI.s over term extensions that had been decided
in defiance of it showed starkly its severely weakened position.
Mahiga acknowledged the resistance of the T.F.G., saying that the
conference had been postponed in March and early April at the T.F.G.’s
request. He then criticized the T.F.G.’s and the T.F.P.’s “arbitrary”
term extensions and proceeded to insert himself directly into the
dispute between them, appearing to take the side of the T.F.P. by
asserting that it had the “constitutional right to extend the
government’s mandate.” Mahiga was also constrained to respond to T.F.G.
Prime Minister Mohamed Farmajo’s call for the U.N. to relocate its
offices from Nairobi to Mogadishu within three months, saying that
relocation was correct in principle, but that it was “unrealistic” at
present – the U.N. needed a “Green Zone” in Mogadishu. Rather than
announcing a broad “consultative” conference that the U.N. would
“facilitate,” Mahiga had been drawn into an internecine political
conflict.
Most problematic for Mahiga was the T.F.G.’s plan to hold its own
conference on the “transition” in Mogadishu, which he was constrained
not to oppose entirely. If Farmajo wanted “another conference,” said
Mahiga, “we will have one,” adding that the Nairobi conference “would go
on.”
On April 7, the U.N. Political Office for Somalia (U.N.P.O.S.), which
Mahiga heads and which was sponsoring the conference, issued a press
release in which the special representative said that the meeting’s
intent was to “pull into sharp focus the needs and tasks that must be
addressed to end the transition.” The conference would also pave the way
for a “follow-up meeting” in Mogadishu “proposed by the T.F.G.” It is at
this point that the attempt of the U.S.-U.N. to manage the “transition”
ended in failure. There would be another conference and it would not be
controlled by the U.N. The push back by the T.F.G. had already been
successful; the U.S.-U.N. had been displaced and was no longer the
protagonist.
Nonetheless, Mahiga continued to try to play a “facilitating” and
“reconciling” role, saying that the conference would seek to strengthen
“dialogue between the Transitional Federal Government and its partners.”
He said that opposition to the meeting was based on “confusion” about
its purpose, which was simply consultative. The “dialogue” that Mahiga
envisioned, of course, seemed to be impossible, because the T.F.G. had
decided not to attend the conference and the attendance of the T.F.P.
was in doubt.
As the U.N. went ahead with its inauspicious plans for the conference,
its major antagonist, the T.F.G., continued its diplomatic
counter-offensive, with Farmajo meeting with Kenya’s prime minister,
Raila Odinga, in order to attempt to persuade him to endorse the
T.F.G.’s planned Mogadishu peace conference. Odinga, in turn, according
to All Headline News, would try to attempt to convince Farmajo to
reverse the T.F.G.’s decision to boycott the Nairobi conference. On
April 7, Farmajo’s visit resulted in a victory for the T.F.G. with
Odinga announcing that Kenya would try to persuade the U.N. to
collaborate in the Mogadishu conference. Farmajo, on the other hand, did
not budge from the T.F.G.’s boycott of the Nairobi conference.
The T.F.G. scored another gain when Gen. Nathan Mugisha, the force
commander of the African Union peacekeeping mission (AMISOM) that
protects the T.F.G. in Mogadishu, came out in support of the T.F.G.’s
one-year term extension, on the basis of AMISOM’s need to work with a
“partner” in making progress against Islamist forces.
On April 7, another front in the T.F.G.’s counter-offensive opened up
when a demonstration against the Nairobi conference mounted by “civil
society groups” and reportedly attended by “thousands” took place in
Mogadisu. Supporting the T.F.G.’s boycott of the conference, the
demonstrators branded the U.N. meeting as a “conspiracy” to divide
Somalia and an “intervention” aimed at destroying the T.F.G. Sh. Ahmed
Abdi Dhi’isow, the head of the Islamic scholars association who
addressed the demonstration, said that he had met with Mahiga and gave
him a nine-point letter urging the U.N. to support the T.F.G. and to
work to improve relations between the T.F.G. and neighboring countries,
and demanding that all conferences concerning Somalia be held in
Somalia. According to Dhi’isow, Mahiga had turned a deaf ear to him.
Dhi’isow concluded by calling on the U.N. secretary-general, Ban Ki-moon,
to sack Mahiga.
On April 8, Farmajo returned to Mogadishu from Nairobi and announced
that the T.F.G. would take part in a U.N. “consultative meeting” under
the condition that it took place in Somalia. The president of the T.F.G.,
Sh. Sharif Sh. Ahmad, continued the diplomatic offensive, travelling to
Uganda for talks with its president, Yoweri Museveni. A group of members
of the T.F.P. accused the “international community” (“donor”-powers
working through the U.N.) of failing to take a “united stand” on
Somalia. The political-diplomatic struggle was in full swing with the
T.F.G. using every resource that it could muster against the U.N. –
domestic and external support, counter proposals (Mogadishu conference),
and challenges (U.N. relocation to Mogadishu).
As the Nairobi conference, scheduled to open on April 12, approached, it
caused a new dispute to erupt, this time within the T.F.P. between
factions in favor of attending the meeting and those opposing
attendance. Aware that the T.F.P.’s speaker, Sharif Hassan Sh. Adan,
intended to participate in the conference, a group of approximately 100
M.P.s declared on April 9 that only the government was authorized to
attend international meetings in which political matters were discussed,
and that the speaker was only authorized to attend international
parliamentary meetings. The anti-conference faction warned M.P.s not to
attend the meeting and repeating the charges that its aim was to
“degrade” the T.F.I.s and that it was a “conspiracy.” In response a
pro-conference faction of M.P.s insisted that it would attend the
meeting, saying that it was “consultative” and that no decisions would
be taken at it. Far from furthering dialogue, the U.N. was continuing on
the path of fragmenting Somali factions even further. Meanwhile, Sh.
Sharif was off to Burundi to meet with its president, Pierre Nkurunziza,
continuing the T.F.G.’s diplomatic counter–offensive.
On the eve of the Nairobi conference, the various Somali factions lined
up for and against attendance, with Sharif Hassan, the president of the
autonomous state of Puntland Abdirahman Mohamed Farole, and the
president of the autonomous authority of Galmudug Mohamed Ahmed Alin
heading to Nairobi; and Somaliland, the T.F.G., and factions of the Sufi
armed movement Ahlu Sunna Wal-Jama’a (A.S.W.J.) staying behind. The
T.F.G. warned “regional administrations,” such as Puntland and Galmudug,
against attendance, stating that they were legally parts of the T.F.G.
and that if they participated in the Nairobi conference “decisions will
be taken against them.” Farmajo’s information advisor, Abdurrahman Omar
Osman Yarisow, called Sharif Hassan’s attendance an “abrupt step taken
without consideration.” Sharif Hassan replied that he had made the
decision to attend after consultations with M.P.s. The spokesman for the
parliamentary faction supporting him, Muse Sudi Yalahow, said that all
those who boycotted the meeting were against stability and peace, and
that T.FP. attendance was necessary “to reinvigorate dialogue among
Somali authorities.” After meeting with Sharif Hassan, Farole, and Alin
separately before the conference was officially opened, Mahiga scaled
down its purpose to “exchanging information” in preparation for “bigger
future peace talks.”
The Conference
The failure of the Nairobi conference was a foregone conclusion from the
viewpoint of the U.N. and the “donor”-powers, led by the U.S., which
inspired the project of taking over the “transition.” By April 13,
Mahiga had been reduced to presiding over an “exchange of information”
preparatory to a “bigger” conference (and doubtless more after that).
Since even the minimal aim of a comprehensive dialogue between the T.F.G.
and its “partners” had to be abandoned in the absence of the T.F.G., the
most that could be done along that line was to articulate what one would
have said to the T.F.G. had it shown up, which does not amount to
dialogue. The Nairobi conference had lost any purpose for the U.N.-U.S.;
it was another temporary placeholder in the decentered process of Somali
politics, part of the violent stalemated waiting game. Indeed, the
“donor”-powers were conspicuously silent about the conference, although
they were present, as always. Denying Mahiga any public support for the
Nairobi conference, of which it wanted to wash its hands, the
“donor”-power coalition of the U.S. and Western European states left
Mahiga alone to dangle on the limb on to which they had pushed him.
The conference, nonetheless, had its purposes for the participants that
had accepted Mahiga’s invitation, which were to articulate their
respective policies, strategic plans, and interests regarding Somali
political organization in an international forum; to win the favor of
the U.N. and “donor”-powers; and to increase their leverage in their own
disputes with the T.F.G. Puntland, the Sharif Hassan faction of the
T.F.P., and Galmudug were not at the conference to engage in “dialogue”
and were not a coalition, and were not in league with the U.S.-U.N. –
they were there to advance their particular interests in “Somalia’s”
political future.
Mahiga as much as admitted defeat in a press release that he issued and
a press conference he gave as the conference opened. The press release
began on a high note, hailing the meeting as a consultation to prepare
the way for a “new political dispensation.” The purpose of “dialogue”
was to “empower” the participants to “oversee” the process “of bringing
the transition to a close.” Having noted the participants, Mahiga struck
a lower note, espressing disappointment that the T.F.G. did not attend.
Taking an almost abject pose, Mahiga said of the T.F.G., “I believe they
have a good story to share with us on the recent achievements and on the
way forward. I truly hope that they can still join us before the end of
the meeting.”
Mahiga broke down even further at the press conference, where he
confessed failure: “I tried, I tried. I had a four hour meeting with the
President in Kampala. Also I met with the Prime Minister. I shared with
him the agenda but unfortunately I failed to satisfy.” Mahiga was
especially disturbed by the demonstrations against the meeting that had
occurred in Somalia, saying that opposition to the conference was based
on “misunderstandings” and that he wished that he had been able to “talk
with the Somali people.”
As Mahgia’s vehicle sputtered, the T.F.G. shifted its counter-offensive
into high gear. The T.F.G. cabinet held a meeting on April 12 and issued
a severe and unequivocal denunciation of the conference. The cabinet
called the conference an “anarchistic meeting” arranged by Mahiga “to
instigate political instability.” Farmajo’s information advisor,
Abdirahman Omar Osman, said that the canbinet’s position was that the
Nairobi conference had “nothing to do with Somalia.” The T.F.G., he
said, had not been consulted by U.N.P.O.S. about the conference. The
cabinet urged Somalis and T.F.G. officials to condemn the meeting as an
attack on Somali sovereignty.
The cabinet also continued its dispute with Sharif Hassan, calling for
him to leave the conference and saying that the speaker had not attend
the meeting with parliament’s and the cabinet’s approval, and that, in
consequence, he was not authorized to represent Somalia there. The
anti-speaker parliamentary faction joined in the attack with a group of
M.P.s (numbering more than 300 of the T.F.P.’s 550 members, according to
the Somaaljecel website) preparing a motion against Sharif Hassan.
Having returned to Mogadishu from his trip to Uganda and Burundi, Sh.
Sharif joined the counter-offensive when he addressed a ceremony marking
the fifty-first anniversary of the establishment of the Somali army,
devoting his remarks to criticizing the “international community” for
failing to help Somalia and, indeed, “not actually wanting to help us
get out of the lawlessness.” If the international community
(“donor”-power coalition) is not willing to help, it should, said Sh.
Sharif, stop intervening: “Every time a problem gets close to being
resolved, the international community creates new political
misunderstandings.” Sh. Sharif called upon the “Somali people” to
consider their political future for themselves; the international
community “will not help.”
The T.F.G.’s counter-offensive had reached its culmination with its
repudiation of the conference to the point of declaring that the meeting
was irrelevant, and its assertion of indifference to it; and its
condemnation of the international community’s malign neglect. Under the
shadow cast by the T.F.G., the conference proceeded in its first day
with statements by its participants putting forth their policies and
pursuing their interests.
Sharif Hassan used his time to defend the T.F.P.’s three-year extension
of its term and to criticize Sh. Sharif and Farmajo for opposing it.
Sharif Hassan insisted that the T.F.G. would end in August, 2011, and
that the T.F.P. would continue. There could not be, said Sharif Hassan,
a “power vacuum.”
Farole put forward Puntland’s vision of a federal Somalia modeled on its
own example of a functioning regional state,and offered to host a
national reconciliation conference. He expressed disappointment at the
T.F.G.’s boycott of the Nairobi conference and said that it showed that
its leadership remained an obstacle to peace. Farole opposed term
extension for the T.F.G., which, he said, had been a “catastrophic
failure.” Instead, he advocated measures of political reform, such as
streamlining parliament and abandoning representation based on clan
quotas.
A.S.W.J., whose factions had been persuaded to attend at the last
moment, carried its divisions into the conference, forcing Mahiga to try
to mediate their internal disputes. The group was able to agree that it
wanted aid in its struggle against the Islamists, which it had initiated
after the latter had destroyed Sufi mosques and cemeteries.
Meanwhile, Farmajo reiterated his challenge to the U.N. to relocate to
Mogadishu, saying that the T.F.G. had created a “safety zone” for its
agencies. He accused the U.N. of spending Somali aid in Nairobi hotels
and threatened to make a case against it to the donors if it failed to
relocate.
After the participants at the conference had laid out their positions on
the “transition,” the meeting moved to drawing up a communiqué that
somehow would sketch a semblance of a common approach. The major players
– the U.N., Sharif Hassan and his faction, and Puntland – had
contradictory interests and did not change them in the first phase of
the conference, so any joint statement would have to paper over rather
than resolve differences.
The seven-point communiqué that emerged from the conference had
something for every major participant, which guaranteed that it would be
incoherent and contradictory.
The first point, which represented U.N./”donor”-power interests, called
for the T.F.G. to end before August 20 with elections for president and
speaker, according to the Transitional Federal Charter. The second point
shifted position, catering to Sharif Hassan and stating that it had
been ”proposed” that the T.F.G.’s term “could be” extended for two
years, adding that the extension would not be “an end in itself” but a
means to preparing for “eventual national elections.” The qualified
rhetoric of point two reflected the U.N.’s and Puntland’s reluctance to
endorse the T.F.P.’s term extension and to put themselves (especially
the U.N.) on the side of the speaker in the T.F.G.-T.F.P. conflict over
the “transition.”
Nonetheless it was there, jeopardizing the role of Mahiga as mediator
and facilitator.
Points three, four, and five repeated boiler-plate U.N.-“donor”-power
calls for “redoubled” efforts to fight terrorism, “intensified” efforts
for “outreache and “reconciliation” by the T.F.I.s, and “accelerated”
efforts toward drafting a permanent “federal constitution.” Point five
catered to the U.N.’s and Puntland’s interests by “acknowledging” that
constitution drafting was a “shared responsibility” between the T.F.G.,
regional states, regional authorities (A.S.W.J., Galmudug), and “other
stakeholders including the international community.”
Point six was Puntland’s piece of the communique, calling for “past
agreements,” such as those that the T.F.G. had made with Puntland and
A.SW.J. (and had not kept), to be adhered to and implemented.
Specifically, the Galkayo agreement that Puntland signed with the T.F.G.
was very favorable to the former, giving it a central place in the
transitional process, including endorsing federalism and making it the
venue for constitution-drafting.
Point seven called for donors to provide more humanitarian and
development aid, a constant refrain in statements from conferences on
“Somalia.”
It is difficult to see how the patchwork of divergent visions and
policies constituting the communique could have any force or effect. The
U.N.’s vision of a comprehensive “reconciliation” process and a quick
“transition” to permanent governing structures runs up against the
T.F.P.’s term extension (possibly cut to two years), which in turn runs
up against Puntland’s path through the Galkayo agreement, which limits
the U.N.’s plans. Given the incoherence of the communique, it is
unlikely that any of the participants will to able to use it for
leverage. The communique is simply a collection of aspirations rather
than a “way forward,” even a set of guidelines and principles, as Farole
interpreted it to be. It will be superseded at the next conference or
even before then.
As the conference closed having failed even in achieving the U.N.’s
modest and reduced aim of fostering “dialogue,” the T.F.G. made a bid to
take over the “transition” for itself. The cabinet met on April 14,
“reviewed” the Nairobi meeting, and declared it to be “fruitless” and
“not representative of the Somali people.”
Stepping into the perceived gap left by the U.N.-“donor”-powers, the
cabinet announced that it would host a “high-level consultation meeting”
of its own in Mogadishu from June 11 through June 16. The cabinet
stressed that the new conference would be the “responsibility” of the
T.F.G., although it would involve the “cooperation” of the international
community and the U.N. Its agenda, the cabinet promised, would be
“pre-shared” with stakeholders and participants “so that they are fully
agreed.” The purpose of the meeting would be to consult on the future of
the Somali people, and the T.F.G. would reach out to all interested
parties, even the armed Islamist opposition.
The T.F.G.’s announcement of its conference marked a change in the
bellicose tone it had adopted in the run-up to and during the Mogadishu
conference. Now that the U.N. had failed, the T.F.G. was ready to be
more conciliatory and take it in as a player, as long as the T.F.G. was
managing the process. The T.F.G. was poised to declare victory in the
political-diplomatic power struggle. Sh. Sharif took off for another
support-building trip, this time to Ethiopia and Tanzania.
The Aftermath of the Conference
In the days following the close of the conference, the dispute within
the T.F.P. continued, with the anti-speaker faction denouncing Sharif
Hassan for agreeing to cut the T.F.P. term extension from three to two
years, and Sharif Hassan hailing his “victory” in getting Mahiga to
agree on a two-year extension. The anti-speaker faction carried on with
its move to impeach Sharif Hassan, now with the added charge that he had
no right to agree to a two-year extension. On April 15, the dispute
within the T.F.I.s spilled into the streets when a pro-Nairobi
conference demonstration in Mogadishu organized by ex-warlord and
ex-mayor of Mogadishu Mohammed Dheere (acting for Sharif Hassan) turned
violent as T.F.G. forces trying to stop the demonstration clashed with
T.F.G. forces loyal to Dheere and with demonstrators. On April 20,
Sharif Hassan met with parliamentary committees and M.P. Umar Islow
announced that there were no longer any disputes within the T.F.P. – all
had agreed that the original T.F.P. three-year term extension would
remain in place. The slight concession that Mahiga had wrung from Sharif
Hassan in Nairobi had been reversed.
On April 17, Mahiga threw in the towel and conceded defeat, announcing
in an interview with the T.F.G.’s Radio Mogadishu that U.N.P.O.S.
supported the T.F.G.’s June conference “from the beginning to the end,”
and that he would participate in it and would “persuade the rest of the
international community to come to the meeting.” Mahiga added that the
“outcome of the Nairobi meeting is supporting the upcoming
reconciliation conference in Somalia.” The Nairobi communique had been
superseded. A new chapter had opened.
On April 19, Sh. Sharif hosted a meeting in Mogadishu with a
“high-level” U.N. delegation on the U.N.’s role in “supporting” the
T.F.G. For the moment the U.N.-“donor”-powers would be seeking leverage
within the T.F.I.s rather than trying to replace them.
On April 21, the T.F.G.’s cabinet met and launched an initiative aimed
at giving it more domestic leverage in managing the transition,
announcing that it was forming a “ministerial level committee” to
propose ways in which citizens could “take an active part in nation
building.” According to the plan, the T.F.G. would set up programs in
security, education, and health and humanitarian affairs to which
Somalis inside and outside the country could contribute; the
contributions would be managed by the new committee “transparently.” The
initiative was meant, according to the cabinet, to put the future of
Somalia in the hands of Somalis and out of the control of the donors.
Also on April 21, Sh. Sharif met with more than one-hundred M.P.s and
announced that he was ready “to take part in the coming presidential
elections,” but added that it was too early to hold them, since disputes
within the T.F.I.s over term extension had to be resolved first, and the
Islamists had to be defeated. Sh. Sharif called for a “comprehensive
strategy going forward.”
In a move intended to engage the term-extension issue, the cabinet
formed a committee on the matter and sent a letter to Sharif Hassan and
the chairs of parliament committees inviting them to a meeting on “to
unify our efforts in ending the Transition Period of the Government.” On
April 23, when the meeting had been scheduled to take place, Farmajo
issued a press release saying that the speaker had failed to show up. It
was not to be expected that Sharif Hassan and the T.F.P. would enter
negotiations on their three-year term extension with the T.F.G. After
a hectic two and a half weeks, “Somalia’s” politics have reverted to
their chronic decentered state. The interminable “transition” goes on
with no apparent prospects for conflict resolution. Now that Mahiga has
appeared to have switched sides, Puntland, which has suspended relations
with the T.F.G., is once again on the outside; Sharif Hassan is left to
fight his battles after a pyrrhic “victory,” and the other “authorities”
in Somalia are left to go their own ways; external actors are free to
pursue their respective and divergent interests.
Report Drafted By: Dr. Michael A. Weinstein, Professor of Political
Science, Purdue University in Chicago weinstem@purdue.edu
|
|